Less Time Equals Better Results?


billpearl1 Less Time Equals Better Results?Why is it that almost everyone you see working out in the gym does high volume bodypart splits? Today is Monday and in just about every gym in America that means it’s chest day. Tomorrow is back, Thursday is legs and Friday is arms…or something like that, I guess.

Why the lack of variety or rational thought? What is the need for all that training volume?

You need to understand that most forms of training have just been passed down for decades from one generation to the next, without the inclusion of rational thought.

Sometime in the 60’s, sensible training programs started becoming less and less prevalent with the rapidly growing usage of anabolic steroids.

In the days of old, men like Steve Reeves and Paul Anderson trained with far more sensible, lower volume, higher frequency programs but these started to disappear during the 60’s. By the time Arnold got to Gold’s Gym in Venice for the first time, high volume, low frequency, bodypart splits were the widely accepted way for everyone to train for size and strength.

This type of training is not based on deductive reasoning but just on the fact that “it’s what everyone else is doing.”

The proponents of these training methods will always blindly tell you that “higher volume training is needed for hypertrophy gains.” Says who? I can tell you for a fact that the University of Chicago isn’t wasting time examining the effects of Jay Cutler’s marathon workouts. There are no studies saying that you need 15-20 sets per bodypart to grow. In fact there are studies that show the opposite; that one set is just as effective as three. (I’m not saying just do one set, only trying to make a point).

For the drug free lifter who does not possess muscle building genetics quite up to par with the Austrian Oak, training this way is a huge mistake. Not only does it drain your amino acid pool and glycogen stores but it dramatically enhances your recovery time between workouts. If you do 15-20 sets for chest on Monday you can not recover from that workout and be able to train again for at least seven days. So you are only getting one growth stimulus per week or fifty two per year.

Now if you reduce your volume to the point where you can recover faster and more efficiently without draining your amino acid pool and glycogen stores so greatly, you can train bodyparts twice per week instead of once. Now instead of 52 growth stimulating workouts per year for each bodypart, you can now do 104. In fact, if the volume is kept low enough some people (with less than 3-5 years of proper training experience under their belts) can even get away with training bodyparts three times a week in certain situations. Now, which do you think will be more effective; 156 growth stimulating workouts per year or 52?

To train more often you absolutely have to lower your training volume. The total number of work sets per training session should be kept at around 12-16 and the total number of top end sets per exercise should be right around 1-3 (not including warm up/ work up sets). There is no need to hit four sets of incline presses, four sets of flat bench presses and four sets of decline presses for your chest workout. Doing that is a form of neuroses; you think that you need to hit every angle and do and endless amount of sets to stimulate every last muscle fiber, but this is simply not the case.

The reason these training programs remain popular is because nobody wants to be told that they are wrong. Admitting your mistakes is something many people can’t do. That’s why when something radically different is proposed, the high volume proponents get upset and offended. Nobody likes to have their ego bruised so they keep on doing and promoting the same old high volume workouts that they always have.

That’s fine, let them continue to do what they choose; personally I have way more important things to do than spend all of my waking hours in the gym. If I can get better results in a fraction of the time I will choose that option.

Cut your volume down, increase the frequency at which you train each muscle group, up your weights and intensity and get ready for the “what are you on” questions to start rolling in.

For fast muscle building workouts ==> MuscleGainingSecrets.com.

Please leave your comments below.

The Renegade Diet

14 Comments so far


  1. Grant Heston
    22. Feb, 2011
    at 4:18 pm
    #


    I couldn’t agree more. I was overtraining for a long time and not going anywhere. Once I cut the volume back, progress on the bar and in the mirror resumed. Thanks for the article Jason.


    • Jason Ferruggia
      28. Mar, 2011
      at 9:32 am
      #


      @Grant Heston: Glad to hear it, Grant.

      @Phil- Very true.

      @Willow- Haha.

      @Michael- Awesome to hear.

      @Alex- Once per week isn’t enough frequency

      @Kellie- Thanks for sharing. And you’re obviously proof that it works.

      @Jack- He recommends an upper/lower split, as do I with most lifters past the beginner stage. And Louie will tell you himself that most people aren’t in shape to train. After many years of training once you bring up your conditioning, GPP, etc and have good recovery ability you can start dragging the sled for extra workouts. But remember, that it is ECCENTRIC-LESS training, which is a HUUUUUGE difference.

      @Bob- Twice a day at sixty? Damn…


  2. Phil
    24. Feb, 2011
    at 4:23 pm
    #


    Great article J, its easy for people of my generation (Y) to get swept up in the hype. We don’t know any better when all the originals who had smart programming are now lost, passed on or no longer used as a primary resource. But instead we have the Cutler wave which has no correlation to the common trainer. Keep the awesome info coming.


  3. Willow
    28. Feb, 2011
    at 12:46 pm
    #


    Long live the King and long live Minimalist Training


  4. michael mellner
    28. Feb, 2011
    at 1:52 pm
    #


    definitely agree 100%…………and I would give up that crap to adopt 3xm. in these days I’m trying it with just two 3xm work out days per week (I have two other days doing UFC like training). and it works like charm even with just two single days………..in addition it let me recover fully to be able to take the next work out day full steam………..

    michael, Italy


  5. Alex
    28. Feb, 2011
    at 2:59 pm
    #


    Good post
    I have tried high volume in the past and it definitly led me to a plateau..
    Been taking your advice and have now cut the volume and tried to finish my workout in 45-60 minutes, the results are very good in every aspect, growth, recovery, stamina and even the amount of new weight i’ve been able to put on the bar..
    I’m training 3 days a week, yes i still use body splits but im now only doing 3 exercises for each body part and 3 sets per exercise wich makes a total of 18 sets per workout.
    Maybe in the future i’ll even try to hit muscles twice per week, but for now im really enjoying the results of what i’m doing.
    I practice a lot of other sports, swimming, stretching and bike riding so i feel that hitting the body parts once a week is enough if i want to recover from all that..
    What do you think J ?


  6. Kellie@motherfitness
    28. Feb, 2011
    at 5:31 pm
    #


    I want to post this on the walls of the locker room at my gym. It really drives me batty (yes, I said batty) when women prescribe to these programs. Not bodybuilders, but women new to the gym, women who are battling weight issues, and women who just want to lose an inch or two. You would think after months and months of droning through these same workouts they would realize things ain’t werkin’.

    I always train within 40 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week, full body or upper/lower… and I can kick the poo out of most guys at my gym when it comes to weight:strength ratios, including dl, chinups, and squats. Guess that 4 hour arm workout isn’t doing them the justice they thought it was….


  7. Jack
    28. Feb, 2011
    at 7:16 pm
    #


    just wondering but doesn’t louie simmons advocate a split routine and extra workouts? i am not saying you are wrong im just questioning what i read based off of louie simmons book, it could be im just misunderstanding the book but if not how would you explain this.


  8. Vaclav Gregor
    02. Mar, 2011
    at 10:46 am
    #


    This article is golden and every guy who works out should read it.

    To sum this up into four rules:

    1. Use variety in everything in your workout.
    2. Do less sets more often.
    3. Don’t do what everybody else is doing, if you don’t want to get the same results as everybody else is getting.
    4. Find out what you are doing that is not working, admit your mistakes, get over them and fix them.


  9. b
    20. Mar, 2011
    at 8:45 am
    #


    jason – At age 60 I find that while I do not follow the ‘minimalist’ training point of view, I do have to be careful. Right now I find that trianing twice a day – with at least an 8 hour break, and training different body part for approx 30 minutes work best – Your Thoughts???
    Bob G


  10. Niko
    26. Aug, 2011
    at 5:37 am
    #


    I don’t understand why people are so reluctant to subscribe to the less is more theory. In every other aspect of life most people are chasing more return for less effort, why is it so different with weight lifting? I think it’s because we are so in love with the training regimes of the professional body builders, we read the magazine articles, we watch their DVD’s and we get brainwashed. I am a big fan of your training systems, maybe it’s time you did a training DVD?


  11. Johnny
    29. Mar, 2012
    at 4:39 am
    #


    Arnold didn’t use a bodypart split. For the first three months after a comlwtition, he would do three-day-a-week fullbody, then move onto a four-day split for the next three months, then for the last six months, he used the famous double split.

    But he always trained each muscle group more than once per week, at a very high volume.

    Once a week is not enough time to be real volume training, the old-school guys trained each muscle two to three times per week with a huge volume.

    High volume works very well, as does high intensity.


  12. Craig L.
    03. May, 2012
    at 7:17 am
    #


    Hearing this high frequency/low volume philosophy at the Renegade Workshop was eye-opening and refreshing. While I’ve gotten results with high volume training, it is really hard to stay motivated to train when killing your body at the gym four or five days per week (not to mention I was also training to failure) – and it’s time consuming to train with high volume!

    My time means a lot to me, as I’m sure it does to most everyone else.

    I would much rather train 6 or 7 days a week, for shorter intervals, and actually look forward to my training sessions each day.

Comment Rules:

The primary comment rule we have is that you keep it cool. You can be critical, but rude or disrespectful comments will be deleted. Also, please use your REAL NAME (initials or even a nickname your friends would call you are okay too), not your business name, and don’t post your website address in the comment text. That’s considered spam, which is completely lame.


So join in on the conversation and let me know what you think. I read every single comment and look forward to hearing from you!