It’s almost impossible to imagine it today, but there was a time, many years ago, when athletes avoided strength training like the plague for fear that it would make them slow and “muscle bound.”
Fortunately we have long since discovered that that was a myth and nowadays just about every athlete on the planet, from tennis players and golfers to football players and wrestlers, participates in some type of strength training program. This is frequently talked about by the announcers and highlighted in pregame videos.
How the sporting world has changed over the years…
Strength training making you slow and “muscle bound…”
What a joke, huh? Those numbskulls back in the 50’s and 60’s really had no clue. Talk about ignorant. Imagine how much better they all could have been.
Pretty sad, right?
Yeah.
Kinda.
Except for the fact that it’s true. They were right.
SAY WHAT?!
Yup, strength training, the way many people practice it, can absolutely, positively turn you into a big, slow, “muscle bound,” good-for-nothing, dummy.
I can not tell a lie.
Listen, many athletes want and need to get bigger. So building muscle is an important focus of the off season training program. But the one thing you absolutely can not do is use any type of bodybuilding method. That is a surefire way to ruin your athleticism.
What exactly do I mean by that? Like I said, athletes are not bodybuilders. The training is not even remotely related. If you use bodybuilding methods with an athlete the chances are he will move more like Jay Cutler the Mr. Olympia competitor and less like Jay Cutler the NFL quarterback. And I can’t imagine that being a good thing.
That’s because bodybuilding training increases your body’s ability to store glycogen locally in the muscles. This extra fluid storage can not contract or produce force. Therefore it is utterly useless. All it will do is slow you down and gas you out.
Ever notice how a lot of the biggest, most jacked up, muscular fighters seem to gas out rapidly? You always hear the announcers talking about how “those big muscles blow up.”
Guys who train with bodybuilding methods get massive pumps just doing some light yard work or scrambling a few eggs.
Sure, that’s great if your only athletic endeavor is applying Pro Tan or hitting double bicep shots at the beach. But if you actually want to be able to run a few plays or fight for more than a few seconds without blowing up and gassing out you need to steer clear of that type of tissue. For the athlete it’s as useless as extra bodyfat.
Athletes need to focus on myofibrillar hypertrophy without the increased ability to store glycogen. In laymens terms myofibrillar hypertrophy simply means real, dense contractile muscle tissue. This type of muscle can produce force. Therefore it is not actually just weighing you down. The other stuff is just like putting slabs of Play Dough on you and will turn you into a big loser on the playing field.
Now, I know some people will want to get into semantics here and argue that any hypertrophy will lead to strength gains and that is true. But IN THE WEIGHT ROOM. Strength gains in the weight room are different from performance gains on the field and are not always directly related.
Read on for five ways to build muscle without actually taking away from your athletic ability in the process.
1. Don’t use slow tempos- For a strength coach to recommend slow tempo training to an athlete is almost criminal. To become explosive and powerful you need to exploit the stretch reflex, not negate it. That means lowering the weight quickly and rapidly reversing direction, exploding through the lifting portion of the exercise.
2. Don’t allow your sets to last longer than 20 seconds, on average- Years ago I used to think power athletes should never do more than six reps per set. And while there is nothing inherently wrong with following this rule, I’ve found that for some people the lack of variety can become a bit boring. So I now allow athletes to go as high as ten reps per set (sticking to six to eight is probably better in most cases, however), on a small amount of assistance work, as long as the total duration of the set doesn’t last more than twenty seconds. That means each of the reps has to be fast and explosive.
Keeping the time under tension short requires you to avoid failure like the plague and stay away from those slow grinding reps that so many people are so fond of.
Maximal strength work will always be done for 1-5 reps, but some assistance work can be done in the range of 6-10 with explosive execution as long as the set doesn’t last more than 20 seconds, total.
3. Don’t do straight sets- Arnold, Flex Wheeler, Ronnie Coleman; they all do straight sets of an exercise before moving on to the next one. So they will do four straight sets of an incline dumbbell press before moving on to the next exercise of the day. Then do four more straight sets. This type of training is great for accumulating fatigue and, again, improving your body’ s ability to store glycogen in the muscles. I recommend that athletes alternate sets and go from one exercise to the next and possibly even to a third exercise. This will give you a longer rest period for specific muscle groups which allows for a higher quality performance on each set. It also negates many of the factors that contribute to that bloated tissue that can’t contract.
For example, after your maximal strength work on say standing military presses, you might rotate through chins, dips and glute ham raises for a few sets of 6-8 reps with 45-60 seconds rest between each set. 
4. Don’t use maximal voluntary contractions (MVC), constant tension, drop sets, super sets or any other bodybuilding techniques- Sometimes bodybuilders will tell you to squeeze the muscle as hard as you can throughout the set. Other times they will tell you never to lock out the reps so as to keep constant tension on the muscle.
Both of these things are all well and good. I would even recommend them to older or beat up lifters just trying to look good and stay healthy. But if you want to be explosive and powerful you need to ignore all of this advice. Forget about squeezing the muscle and maximizing the pump. Just be explosive and get stronger week to week. That’s all that’s important. And locking out your reps is not a bad thing. It allows you to use more weight and get some oxygen to the muscle between reps. But if you do lockout, remember to keep the sets under twenty seconds.
As for super sets and drop sets, see number one on this list.
5. Use a full range of motion- If your goal is just to build size it’s often advantageous to use a limited range of motion on certain exercises. As an athlete, however, you can not take this risk. You need to train the muscle through its full range of motion so that you develop strength and flexibility simultaneously (flexibility without strength in that range is useless) and don’t become tight and “muscle bound.”
So there you have it; five ways to build muscle without ruining your athleticism and becoming a big, silly, bloated dummy in the process.
For more info on how to become a dominant gridiron warrior check out my newly released Renegade Strength & Conditioning For Football. It’s only available til this Saturday then I’m pulling it til next spring.
Please leave your comments below.

























28. May, 2010
at 9:31 am #
That was great post Jay, thanks for sharing, I learned a lot. On point number five, what if you’ve had shoulder issues in the past and try to avoid full range of motion on say dumbbell presses for example?
30. May, 2010
at 8:53 am #
@Chris: Yes, if you have had shoulder issues then definitely avoid full range of motion.
28. May, 2010
at 10:15 am #
Most guys get into bodybuilding when they want to get bigger and stronger for a sport like football, baseball, or basketball. And then they fall in love with the look and sometimes even put the sports on the back burner because now they’re getting more attention from the girls.
That’s fine and dandy, if that’s what you want (and what teenage boy doesn’t, really?).
It’s all about knowing what you want and then doing what it takes to get there. Jason is absolutely correct that specificity of training is very important, and while the exercises may be similar, the outcomes are certainly much different when training for athleticism versus bodybuilding bulk.
28. May, 2010
at 10:28 am #
OK – let’s keep it real shall we???
Those athletes you refered to got off on the the Big “S” word that the Weiders of the world and others fail to identify and acknowledge in their mags, and other products…Steroids…( meaning performance enhancing drugs, etc.) the steroid “baby dolls” are the ones who look great and have ‘heap big smoke and no wampum’ when it comes to real athletic performance…why is everyone so afraid to say this????
28. May, 2010
at 12:35 pm #
I almost went ballistic when I read your e-mail regarding, “most of us want to get BIGGER and stronger..blah blah blah.” As much as I cringe at the little girl who “wants to tone and not get bigger,” I am more prone to cringe at the folks that think we WANT to get bigger. What the bodybuilding community doesn’t realize is that some of us out here are happy with our bodies and we are in the gym to get STRONGER, not bigger. Relative strength. I am not opposed to moving up a weight class, but understand that when I run a 10K or walk/run a marathon for fun, or am backpacking up a mountain, the extra weight is marginally helpful but overall detracts from performance. At 8 to 10% bodyfat, I can deal with the unusable muscle. I need to be all around athletic, not just in climbing or in endurance sports, so the extra muscle is helpful, to a degree. But there is a limit. Once you’ve reached that limit, it is important to concentrate on relative strength as much as possible. I don’t lift for the mirror, I lift to be strong and to climb the mountain.
P.S. Have you ever seen an endurance athlete that can run the marathon, but a 40lb backpack makes them cry? Sad. Also sad is the guy that can bench 400lbs for 8 reps (very admirable) but is still short of breath 30 minutes later? Sad again.
28. May, 2010
at 12:50 pm #
As far as full ROM for athletes; do you “break that rule” from time to time w/ your athletes? i.e. rack pulls. Or do you go full ROM for every movement w/ your athletes?
Thank you.
28. May, 2010
at 2:25 pm #
My best friend is laughing at me for sending him this article because he does the Arnold style workouts and looks good a lot better than me. I have to ask you about the MGS system I bought, is there an e-mail address I can send it at or do I have to embarrass myself here?
28. May, 2010
at 2:55 pm #
@Jason
I’m sure you’re aware that David Boston was training with Poliquin, who probably trained him very similarly to how you outlined, as he takes many similar positions in his writings on training athletes.
Anyways, David Boston went from 209 -> 238 pounds prior to the 2001 season, according to this espn.com article.
http://insider.espn.go.com/insider/story?id=1599490
http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=132004
Cross reference this with his stats at nfl.com, and you see his best seasons were 2000 & 2001. More receptions, yards in 2001 after the weight gain, less touchdowns.
Hard to argue that his increase in muscle mass impacted his career more than say his knee injury.
Chris
28. May, 2010
at 3:25 pm #
That was very informative! I really learned a few things i would have never found out alone.
28. May, 2010
at 6:11 pm #
Sick article Jay, clears up everything we’re doing in the gym and why..love it man can’t wait to see the results after we’re done
28. May, 2010
at 9:45 pm #
Nice one Larue.
29. May, 2010
at 5:25 am #
Awesome article, these are very practical guidelines.
I don’t use a stopwatch when I am lifting to measure the seconds under tension. What do you think of having a certain number of reps in mind, say 25 and then starting with rep 1 and stopping when you think you can’t fully contract all muscles, taking 30-90 seconds of rests and then starting the next reps untill the 25 reps are done?
29. May, 2010
at 3:49 pm #
@ Daniel -I think you need to read more of his articles..
29. May, 2010
at 6:36 pm #
that’s what I’m talking about Jason!
This is my biggest fight in this world:
- teaching athletes not to train like bodybuilders
- teaching coaches that training the right way, athletes won’t get tight and slow.
@ Rick
I agree with you. Those bodybuilding magazins are just running every athletes who read them their chances to get better on the field.
30. May, 2010
at 2:00 am #
@ Deavel: which one?
30. May, 2010
at 7:35 am #
bodybuilding is a sport too, and actually it takes more dedication, determination, and courage than any other sport out there, so if u have the balls to do bodybuilding , go for it
sure almost all athletes bust their ass in training, but bodybuilding doesnt end when u leave the gym. u might know the saying “you dont grow in the gym, u grow outside of it” training is only part of the equation, rest, nutrition, and supplementation are equally as important.
no matter what anybody says, gettin serious pre-contest takes more dedication than ANYTHING. period.
so i’ll keep my drop sets, negatives, etc. and be disgustingly shredded on stage this november!!
30. May, 2010
at 8:57 am #
@ Danny- There are exceptions to the rule. I would use rack pulls over deads from the floor for most athletes.
@ Chris D- In my mind that second article confirms what I was saying because his career was all downhill from the 2002 season on. Maybe I’m nuts, though.
@ Rob- Please stick to the topic at hand. This comment has nothing to do with above article.
Thanks for all the comments, guys. Much appreciated.
30. May, 2010
at 11:01 am #
Hi Jay,
I’m 6′ 185lbs with 15-19% bodyfat (those things are never accurate) and train for basketball.
I am currently on the WS4SB by Joe Defranco Program. I am considering starting to Bike to my gym which is 4km away roughly. So 4km there and 4km back every workout, will this be detrimental to strength or size gains? Will it aid in fat loss?
Great job with the site, I appreciate all the great Information you are putting out. I have 3XM and will do it when I am done with WS4SB.
-Hadi
30. May, 2010
at 12:33 pm #
jay, why would rack pulls better for same athletes than deads from the floor? is this because of injuries? assuming good lower back health, which would be better for say a mixed martial artist?
31. May, 2010
at 2:48 pm #
Anyone dedicated to excellence in any sport, never just leaves it at the gym.
Anyway, I have a question. Training for law enforcement, one of the testing protocols is a timed run. That being said, the training during college involves alot of distance running, which doesn’t seem like the best way to mimic the activity of chasing down a perp and then controlling them. I doubt we will job on foot for 3.5 miles.
Anyway, I am trying to gain and likely just maintain my strength during this phase. The running is mandatory and there is just no getting around that. Do you have any suggestions on a running/strength training? I’m turning 40 this year and I have learned to turn the dial down on volume and it ‘seems’ to be working somewhat.
After college, I plan on resuming the athletic/strength/mass training. I haven’t picked up 3XM, but plan to.
02. Jun, 2010
at 9:55 am #
Great concept of the article, but certain points i don’t agree with. David Boston- if dude is running a 4.3 and bigger, how can you argue with that?
The 20seconds and under is over blown. You may a guy/girl doing power cleans for low reps and still be over 20 sec. when you take into account resetting between reps.
Straight sets- if rest periods are correct you’re not necessarily going to accumulate fatigue.
02. Jun, 2010
at 1:53 pm #
Hadi- I wouldn’t bike to the gym. Cardio before strength is never a good idea.
Auzzie- Because it’s harder to learn to pull from the floor and because you usually only get 12 weeks with an athlete. It’s also more dangerous and riskier to pull from the floor. Not worth it for most athletes.
Kelly- Since distance running is mandatory there isn’t a lot you can do. Just keep your volume of strength training low; especially for lower body. I wouldn’t do more than one strength day per week for legs. Make sure your nutrition and sleep is optimal.
PT- I guess I was mistaken about Boston. I thought it was the following year that he went downhill. Apparently it was the next season. I think the extra weight caught up to him.
I agree that the 20 seconds thing is overblown but it’s a great guideline. The last thing you want is those 40-70 second sets. If you end up going 25-30 seconds it’s not the end of the world.
Agreed on straight sets. Of course, if the rest periods are correct you won’t accumulate fatigue. The point is you need to get these guys in and out in under an hour. Not gonna happen if you do straight sets with full rest intervals.
06. Jun, 2010
at 11:54 pm #
Hello.
Thanks for a greate article. I have one question though. I have read some of Craig Ballantyne TT workout and I think he uses the term “super sets” in a different way than you. Is the super sets that you say we should avoid (in point 4) something different than the super sets CB uses to avoid straight sets (point 3)?
08. Jun, 2010
at 6:53 am #
Once again, you’ve managed to take something that should be inherently known to trainers and smacked them across with the face and made it blatantly obvious. Honestly, training like an athlete is all that I know and those are methods I’ve used throughout the years, I’ve just never really sat down and thought about all those little intricasies like that.
Thanks for the great post!
05. Nov, 2010
at 10:16 am #
Great post on the type of lifting that’s really going to pay off in athletics as opposed to a lot of the bodybuilding techniques/principles out there!
16. Mar, 2012
at 9:36 am #
You know, it’s funny, as a trainer I have noticed that with women it is trying to get them not to just do cario all the time and lift weights (especially heavy weights), and with guys its about including training athletically too and not just training like a body builder (for looks).
16. Mar, 2012
at 9:37 am #
cadio