How Bad Do You Want It?
October 31, 2007
There’s plenty of people out there who continually make excuses for their lack of progress. Matt Rhodes is not one of them. Matt was a skinny guy with a fast metabolism. Like a lot of people, Matt thought he could never gain weight. That is until he met Vinny Dizenzo who completely changed his mindset. Once he made the commitment, Matt went from 240 to 300 pounds. He also traveled several hours per week to train with guys who were better than him and to learn from the best.
So if you or someone you know thinks that you are destined for failure and won’t ever be able to gain weight or get strong because-
- you have a fast metabolism
- don’t have a big appetite
- have crappy genetics
- have a small bone structure
- don’t use all the steroids “those guys do”
I highly suggest you take a few minutes and listen to how Matt Rhodes did it. I once went from a 147 pound high school senior to 231 pounds a few years down the road but I learned quite a bit from talking with and listening to Matt this weekend. I hope you do the same.
More Funny Stuff From Boston
October 30, 2007

We were supposed to be doing the two tough guys pose but I couldn’t keep a straight face (as usual).
**********
What I Learned at the Big Seminar By Alwyn Cosgrove
1. Big is a relative term. What is Big in Boston would not be allowed into Rhodestown.
2. Nick Rhodes from Duran Duran has gained a lot of weight since the glory days. He is no longer “hungry like the wolf”. In fact he usually leaves food on his plate.
3. If a 275lb man doesn’t finish his dinner, a 300lb man will be upset.
4. Jason Ferruggia really is a vegetarian. It was not a marketing ploy for his new product line as was originally thought.
5. In the host’s wisdom – you should put the guy who flies in from a different time zone on first. Which was 5 in the morning his time. Which means he has no idea what he said.
6. Jabba the Hutt was based on a real person.
7. A goatee that is too heavy can cause a large muscle imbalance.
8. Jim thinks programs are not important
9. Jim thinks plans are very important.
10. No one knows the real difference between programs and plans except for Jim. And he’s not telling.
11. Jim thinks goals are extremely important.
12. For the love of God DO NOT tell Jim you don’t have a goal.
13. Jim believes that you can get to Chicago if you just drive. In any direction. With no map.
14. Jim thinks that people should only buy one book.
15. That book is the New Rules of Lifting by Alwyn Cosgrove
16. Or Afterburn.
17. There are people on internet forums who hate me. I am “the worst trainer they have ever heard of”.
18. But they HAVE heard of me ….
19. A dying child from the make-a-wish foundation who wants to visit Rhodestown just once will not get in. Even if he weighs 274.9.
20. Jim hates Crossfit
21. Jim hates kettlebells
22. Actually Jim hates everything. Particularly people who don’t ask questions. And don’t have goals. Or ask questions about goals.
23. Boxers can only lift 88lbs. 89lbs would be too much.
24. Jim has no comment about (CENSORED)
25. Jason has deduced that if you have two clients instead of one – it is better.
26. BTW – it’s RELENTLESS – not ridiculous
27. Dave Tate is the worst person ever to play word association with.
28. Jim Wendler is the word association World champion and greatest of all time.
29. Murph believes in non-conventional training
30. This consists of squats, deadlifts and bench presses
31. Jim thinks the drawback of non-conventional training is that the equipment is hard to find.
32. Waxy maize is not a breakfast cereal
33. It is indeed a high molecular weight carbohydrate.
34. No one knows what that means. Except Justin Harris.
35. No one knows how much rice molecularly weighs.
36. It is imperative that you memorize lines from There’s something about Mary and Anchorman if you want to succeed in this industry
**********
Additions to Alwyn’s List by Smitty from the Diesel Crew
Things seen at TPS this weekend:
Hairy man, with pants down around his ankles in the lobby of TPS, wearing a black mankini
Murph with entire can of cope in his lip
Dudes sitting around doing nothing….sweating
A bar that wouldn’t serve more than one beer
A Trojan condoms hockey jersey
Dudes walking on treadmills with flip flops
A Scot rubbing my lips while I’m in between bites of pizza
Things heard at TPS this weekend:
“Yeah dude, I stick my tongue all the way in…”
“…spray that on my ass, I got major swamp ass…”
“Dude, are you serious? Get out of my bed, I don’t even know you…Smitty, get up here!”
“Smitty, you’re hardcore? …you shouldn’t get them handed up unless your back is hurt”
“yeah, I’m getting another tattoo on the other side of my neck….i can’t talk about it”
Question: “You tore your bicep?” Reply: “Yeah, but I locked it out.”
“You guys got a treadmill? I got to get warmed up…Vinnie do you know how to turn this thing on?”
“1985? I was smoking angel dust and holding people up at knife point”
“Yeah dude, warrior lip rub”
Smitty
**********
My Weekend in the City of Bad Accents by Vincent Dizenzo
Dave, Jim, Murph, Alwyn, and Jason are very cool and hospitable guys. You can learn from all of them regardless of what you do. Actually, Jim’s not that hospitable, but he is the other things. Here were my highlights:
-I got to train with Dave Tate!
-Jim has hot legs.
-Alwyn does a hell of a Shrek impersonation and is about the funniest guy I have ever met.
-Jason does not like Alwyn.
-Murph is still dirty.
-Rhodes hates boneless chicken wings.
-Cancer sympathy is good for two years, but it won’t get you into Rhodestown (might get you into Rhodesville).
-Even the Mayor can be thrown out of Rhodestown.
-You need to flex for pictures.
-Murph is now down a small stone as well as a trap bar.
-Wendler is not in Rhodestown, but somehow runs the damn place.
-Pink asprin give you a headache.
-Dave really likes being big.
-You can’t talk about _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-Those guys are even more f@cked up than I am!
Thanks for having me. Can’t wait until the next time.
Rhodestown
October 30, 2007

I spent this past weekend with my good friends Dave Tate, Jim Wendler, CJ Murphy and Alwyn Cosgrove. Minus Dave, we were all speaking at The Big Seminar being held at Murphs place, Total Performance Sports. My full recap of the weekend will be coming up on Friday but for now I would like to share some funny stuff.
To understand what we are talking about you need to know what Rhodestown is. Rhodestown was created by heavyweight powerlifter, Matt Rhodes. It’s basically all about being big and strong and the opposite of metrosexual. Rhodes, Vinny Dizenzo, Dave and Jim all take acceptance into Rhodestown very seriously, which made for some hilarious conversations over the weekend including Cosgrove’s excessive questioning about how he could get in. Below is Matt’s original post:
Welcome to Rhodestown
We will not be drinking Kool-aid. Rather, Liquid D-Bol in Gatorade, EVERYDAY!
I feel it’s time to elevate my god-like status to that of cult leader. My followers are growing in numbers. This is a message for those who choose to listen, and a warning for those that do not. And, I am the one to bring this message. A message of hope.
Here are some of the basic requirements of membership in the cult:
1. You MUST be at least 275lbs, regardless of height
2. amendment to #2 – if you are not 275, you must REALLY want to be and you MUST be trying REALLY hard to get there
3. You must be happy when someone refers to you as “fat”
4. Progress Reports (stretch marks, to the non-cult member) are absolutely necessary
5. Sweating ALL the time, regardless of temperature is required and graded
6. You must have trouble wiping your ass and are willing to deal with it if you cannot finish the job properly
7. You DON’T have to take off your shirt to looked jacked. If there is any question, you’re out
8. Visible abs are severly frowned upon
9. amendment to #8 – the top 2 can be out, but no more!
10. You must believe and put into practice that McDonald’s is the perfect pre-workout food
11. You count PR’s and 45lb plates, ONLY!
12. You must be willing to have a “fat-off” (like a flex-off) to see who has more bodyfat
13. You can ONLY measure your:
- neck
- belly at bellybutton
- and hips
Noone cares about how big your biceps are.
14. Addition to #13 – your neck must be bigger than your head. The nickname, “Stack of Dimes” is not cool
15. You must use 45lb and 25lb plates only. “Dimes, nickels, and chips are for chicks.” -Dave Tate
16. If you ask, “How much do the chains weigh?” or, “How much tension does that band give?” you will be beaten, badly.
17. Under Armour or any form-fitting shirts are banned
18. If you are wearing a sleeveless shirt and hear, “You have a string hanging from your shirt.” Put on a shirt with sleeves. The next part of that question is, “Oh, sorry. Those are your arms.”
19. No one follows Prilipin’s chart or calculates percentages – SMASH F@CKING WEIGHTS!
20. If you miss a weight in training, you will hear, “2 MORE REPS!” as the bar is being pulled off you
21. You must not put anything in your mouth that doesn’t have calories in it
22. Amendment to #21 – your girlfriend/boyfriend is ok
23. You WILL be sodomized by all members of the cult upon acceptance. We will be wearing condoms and using Capsacin as lube. We do not provide mouthpieces so bring your own
24. If you are gay, that’s totally cool. But, you must divulge this information so that when we are insulting each other and saying, “you’re so gay, dude.” we can make sure to say, “you’re so hetero, dude.” to you. If we are insulting, we want to make sure everyone’s feelings are hurt.
25. If you have veins that are visible, other than in your penis, the Council of Fatties will have to determine if you still can be considered for acceptance
26. While training for a contest, you can ONLY gain weight. We in RHODESTOWN do not cut weight
27. There is no cutting/bulking season. It’s a perpetual bulk. And we don’t call it a bulk. It will be refered to as “getting jacked” or “getting fat”
28. Amendment to #27 – if health concerns arise, they must be brought to the attention of the Council of Fatties. If the Council cannot come to a decision, the final call will be made by Jabba the Hutt. His decision is final!
29. If you can see your cheek bones, collar bones, jaw bone, you need to start eating McDonald’s for every meal until the problem is solved
30. It is looked upon with great reverance if your cholesterol is higher than your bodyweight.
31. You must retain water at all times
32. It is preferred that your blood pressure is high by medical standards. You must not care. Noone needs to live forever. We are here to SFW!
33. No food is to be left on your plate. If you throw up in your mouth, swallow it back down, and continue eating, you will excel here in RHODESTOWN.
34. Amendments to #30 and #32 – you may take the appropriate medications to control the problems. However, NO CHANGE IN DIET WILL BE ALLOWED! NO WEIGHT LOSS WILL BE ALLOWED, unless deemed acceptable by Jabba Himself.
35. You must find Tranny’s hot
36. No more than 3 days per week or 12 days per month of cardio.
37. Amendment to #36 – sex doesn’t count as cardio, but, you MUST be on the bottom. If you change positions, please videotape it so we can learn how it’s done. Then, go to the refrigerator and start eating. There is NO REASON TO NOT BE ON THE BOTTOM! If you can/want to change positions, you’re not big enough.
38. Absolutely NO Red Sox or Patriots fans. You people are so retahded and I can’t stand the accent or ignorance. Get in youah cah and get the F@CK OUT!
39. We in RHODESTOWN are Dallas Cowboys fans. We do not recognize other sports
40. Sleep Apnea is preferred. However, we do recommend that you get a CPAP.
41. If you are hungry, EAT. If you are not hungry, EAT. It’s that simple
42. Flip flops are to be worn year-round regardless of climate. If you can/want to put on and tie shoes, you must refer back to #41 and #1
43. Fat, bloated , and strong is the ONLY way to go thru life
44. Glenn Ross, Vasily Alexyev, Zadrunas Savikas, William “The Refrigerator” Perry, Nate “The Kitchen” Newton, Johnny Perry, OD Wilson, and Fat Bastard from Austin Powers are to be refered to as “beautiful”. Others that fit the mold are to be refered to in a like manner.
45. You must put butter on everything you eat. Crisco is better.
46. There are no medical or dental benefits, but you will receive a free haircut
If you have concerns or questions, you’re probably not going to be accepted. Do not try to deceive us here in RHODESTOWN. We will know if there are non-believers in our midst. You will be punished!
-your leader, Matt Rhodes
Disclaimer: I have the final word on acceptance into RHODESTOWN. If you are not accepted, you will be killed and eaten. Nothing will deter us from our mission to rid the world of Metrosexuals, Health Clubs, counting calories, maintenance diets, lifting to look good/get chicks, and prejudice towards others.
Feedback on Interval Training
October 29, 2007
(NOTE: Don’t miss the video at the end of this post)
Friday morning I opened my inbox to find triple the normal amount of emails as usual. These extra emails were all reactions to my last two posts about intervals. As I scanned through them, one in particular caught my eye. The subject was “Thank God someone finally said it” and the email was from none other than world renowned fat loss expert and fellow Jersey native, Tom Venuto.
“I got a real kick out of your last 2 articles… glad you said it like only a guy like you can say it!
”
Tom Venuto
Tom is the author of the highest selling fitness ebook of all time, Burn The Fat, and has helped thousands to get in the best shape of their lives. He is also a competitive bodybuilder who regularly steps on stage in with bodyfat in the low single digits. Like Arnold, Franco, Shawn Ray, Flex Wheeler, Dorian Yates, Ronnie Coleman and Jay Cutler he does steady state cardio to get himself in that kind of shape; not intervals.
Tom talks the talk and walks the walk. Tom gets himself and all his clients and customers in mind blowing shape with lots of hard work and usually without the use of intervals. Although most people wouldn’t expect Tom Venuto and I to agree on much, the fact of the matter is we agree on way more than you would assume.
That’s the point most people miss. They are always looking for the differences instead of the similarities between coaches or trainers.
I spent the weekend with my close friend Alwyn Cosgrove and explained to him how I received a few emails from people who were bewildered by the fact that AC recommends intervals and I spoke out against them.
“I thought you guys were good friends.”
Well, first of all, you can be friends with someone and disagree with their training philosophy. I never used to think this was possible but then I grew up and realized how ridiculous this thought process was. Secondly, you have to understand that the answer to every training related question is “It depends.”
It depends on the athlete or lifter, training age, goals, injuries, experience, strength levels, etc, etc, etc.
So, as surprising as this may be to many people, Alwyn and I actually share many of the same thoughts on cardio and fat loss. When I presented a seminar to his staff at his gym earlier this year I was asked a question about what type of cardio to do in a certain situation to preserve muscle mass and when I said I wouldn’t do intervals, no way, no how, everyone in the room gasped and looked in Alwyn’s direction. Much to everyone’s shock, AC told everyone that, in that situation, he agreed with me 100%.
And there are many situations where I agree with him. In fact, we agree on most training related issues, probably 99% of the time. But it’s hard to express that across the internet. Unless you speak to both of us, many of you probably assume that we would disagree more often than agree. It’s simply not the case.
Anyway, here’s some more feedback on the intervals issue (my replies are in bold)…
Jason,
I gotta say, very interesting point. I always wondered why authors use pictures of bodybuilders in their articles who DON’T train with intervals, etc…. strange how you would ‘dog’ their methods but yet exploit their bodies in your article… hmmm
Jimi Varner
**********
Haven’t you said before in men’s fitness or one of your books that if one guys does intervals for 20 minutes after a weight training session and another guys does not, that the first guy will stay leaner?
Switch
Yes.
**********
Yeah, everything is rush, rush, rush anymore. Trainers try to sell you on the quick and easy method, when the smart money is always on slow and steady wins the race. There is no quick and easy way to get ripped and huge – if that were so, would we see fat people at every corner? I know the largerst excuse is: “There is not enough time in my day, I am too busy.” I say bullshit ! Who does not have 20 minutes to set aside for cardio or a high intensity workout?? Get up earlier or stay up later, turn the TV off, put the video game down or whatever else you might do and pick up a weight instead. everybody can find 20-30 minutes.
Dave Z
I agree 100%.
**********
Hi Jason, I understand what you say about intervals being over rated for fat loss, but what about using intervals for conditioning? I submission wrestle and train MMA the bouts are normally 5 minutes or there abouts and usually only a few rounds (at least at the amateur level) do you think intervals are useful for conditioning for this type of short duration activity?
Regards
James
I think varied intensity energy system training that mimics your sport is always very effective. I don’t think intervals like they are recommended by many trainers for fat loss are very effective, though. Again, it depends on the situation. As an MMA competitor you would do best by doing sprints and strongman training and basically just getting on the mat. That is going to be your best form of “sport specific” conditioning.
**********
Finally, I would like to share a brief video from my good friends Dave Tate and Jim Wendler. For those that don’t know, Dave went from 310 pounds all the way down to somewhere around 240 and 4% bodyfat. It was one of the most impressive transformations I had ever seen. He never did intervals once.
Over the last year or two Jim has gone from 285 to 240 and, like Dave, never did interval training once. For a good laugh, check out the video below.
Gotta love it.
JF
The Truth About Intervals- Pt. 2
October 25, 2007
Yesterday, as expected, I ruffled a lot of feathers and generated a lot of positive responses with my post about why intervals suck. Some of you love doing intervals and others were in full agreement with me about their effectiveness. If you love doing intervals then you should continue to do them. Doing something you love doing will always improve your results. If you have very limited time, then you might want to opt for some kind of interval training as well. That is one of the benefits that the proponents of intervals sell- get twice the results in half the time. But I have never really seen it happen. I have never seen anyone get truly ripped from doing a few 10-15 minute interval sessions per week. People who get ripped put in a lot of hard work. I honestly believe that you don’t need more than three 45-minute weight training sessions per week to get great results in size and strength. But getting ripped, especially if you are fat to begin with, or just want to get down below 8% body-fat, requires a lot of time and effort. Bodybuilders often finish their last few weeks before a contest with 12 traditional cardio sessions per week of 30-60 minutes each. A little different than three 15-minute interval sessions, huh? The reason they do 6-12 sessions per week instead of three is because they know the real truth about getting extremely lean- it takes a lot of time and work. That kind of time commitment and dedication goes against what everyone seems to be preaching these days- exercise less. Exercise less? Why? What is this trend all about? Why are fitness professionals telling you that you can get a great workout in 5 minutes or that you can get 8 minute abs? Obviously these people must know that it’s impossible to get ripped or be in great shape or be healthy with that little amount of exercise per week. At least I hope they do. Otherwise they are blatantly lying to you. We have gotten so far away from healthy exercise recommendations that it’s scary. If you really want to get in great shape and be healthy then I honestly believe that you should be doing some kind of exercise every single day for a bare minimum of 30 minutes. And the only time I have seen interval training to be truly effective is with hockey and soccer players. But what they do is so far from traditional mainstream cardio machine interval training that it really bares no comparison. For these athletes, varied intensity energy system training is a very efficient conditioning method. And plenty of hockey players that I have seen or worked with have the abs to show how effective it is for fat loss. But again, this is nothing like sitting on a stationary bike for 15 minutes every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. To learn more about getting the six pack abs you desire while still maintaining or building muscular size and strength visit www.rippedabdominals.com right now. It’s not too late to sign up to listen to interviews with some of the worlds top fitness experts. Train smarter, Jason Ferruggia
The Truth About Intervals
October 24, 2007

The simple truth about intervals is this- they suck. You want evidence that they
suck? Let’s take a look at the leanest people on the planet.
First we have competitive bodybuilders. None of them do intervals. Never have
never will. They all do steady state cardio. Some do high intensity, some do low
intensity. But none of them ever do intervals.
How about sprinters? They sprint. Then they rest. For a long time; not 30-60
seconds. How long do they sprint for? Usually about ten seconds at the most. A
100 meter dash takes an elite sprinter about ten seconds to compete. And after
they do that they are completely gassed and need at least 3 minutes rest before
they can repeat the effort.
What about wide receivers, running backs and defensive backs? Anyone see Reggie
Bush on the cover of the most recent Men’s Fitness with no shirt on? How about
Terrel Owens on the cover of Sports Illustrated last year? These are physiques
that most people would kill for.
Do they do intervals?
Absolutely not.
They sprint and then they rest. They do plyos and conditioning drills and
practice plays. None of which resemble intervals in the least.
None of the leanest people in the world do intervals yet it is supposed to be
the greatest method of fat loss. Kind of puzzling if you ask me.
The general recommendation for intervals is to use a bike or a treadmill and
“sprint” for 30-60 seconds followed by a coasting period of 60-120 seconds. Now
let’s get one thing straight right out the gate before you blow out a knee or
tear a hamstring. No one, and I mean NO ONE, that is not a very well conditioned
athlete can sprint for 30-60 seconds. NO ONE!
Try it and you will find that out for yourself. You will probably also get
injured.
If Olympic sprinters are gassed after a ten second sprint how do think the
average person can possibly sprint for six times that length of time? I know I
couldn’t.
Intervals are harder to recover from then steady state cardio or short distance
sprints with adequate rest periods. This means they will interfere with your
size and strength gains. I have seen it happen time and again. Depending on who
you ask, they can also actually be more catabolic than steady state cardio.
If you are looking to get bigger and stronger while maintaining your bodyfat
levels or even simultaneously get leaner, you should probably avoid doing too
many intervals. Instead stick with short sprints or old school steady state
cardio (just be sure to mix it up and add in as much variety as possible like
running, biking, rope jumping, hiking, etc.). It has worked for the leanest
athletes on the planet for decades so I can assure you that it will work for
you.
For more on losing fat and building muscle, click HERE.
Train hard,
Jason Ferruggia
**********
“Jason Ferruggia has done it again. He has unlocked the plethora of knowledge
that he has amassed in his many years in the strength and conditioning industry.
If you are looking to get bigger, stronger, and faster, then this should be your
bible. After reading all of this amazing information, if you don’t accomplish
your goals, you just aren’t trying!
Andrew Slater
Basking Ridge, NJ
“Jay, thanks so much for the great package. It is definitely the best I have
ever read.”
Frank Rittenhouser
“I’ve been editing fitness and health books for the better part of two decades,
and believe me it’s rare to find an expert in this category who can actually
write. Jay writes with an informed casualness–he’s entertaining, honest,
informative, and funny.”
Megan Newman
Publisher, Avery
An imprint of Penguin Group USA
**********
Fast muscle building workouts ==> www.musclegainingsecrets.com
P.S. Don’t miss The Big Seminar this coming Saturday in Boston! Go to
http://www.totalperformancesports.com/BIG_seminar.htm for more information on
how you can become the best trainer or strength coach in your area and double
your income.
Re-Examining the Conjugate Method
October 17, 2007
Over the last few years, it seems that just about every “in the know” performance coach has discussed the conjugate method and why they find it to be the most effective way to train an athlete. By now I think we all know the definition of conjugate or concurrent periodization and how it involves simultaneously trying to raise multiple qualities. Pretty much all of my highly respected colleagues use or have used the conjugate method. I know I have. And without hesitation I will tell you that in a limited time situation, such as a summer’s worth of training for an off season football player, it is the best way to train.
The results you can achieve in three months of training with the conjugate method are outstanding. You can get significantly bigger, stronger and faster in only twelve weeks. A large percentage of competitive athletes only have 12-16 weeks of uninterrupted training time per year. The rest of the year, they are usually playing one or more sports and have very little time to train. Most of my high school athletes play more than one sport and even college football players play from August until sometimes January. After that they have a short break before spring ball starts and then they finally get 8-12 weeks off in which they have nothing to do but train. In those 12 weeks there is a lot to accomplish. The muscle mass that was lost during the season must be regained and new muscle mass must usually be built. We also have to rehab any injuries and work on preventing new ones. Lastly, but most importantly, we need to get stronger and faster.
With only 12 weeks to do all of this, there is definitely not enough time to do any of it in separate phases. The only plausible approach to take in this situation is to just jump into a well rounded conjugate training template and improve all of these qualities simultaneously. That is what many successful coaches do in this situation and to be honest, I don’t think you can beat the results. Every summer, my football players go back to camp with several pounds of new muscle, a better forty time and are significantly stronger than the previous year. In fact, this summer, with a few minor changes to the lower body training protocol, the average improvement on the squat was just over 80 pounds with one guy actually adding 110 pounds in 16 weeks. It should be noted that these were experienced and strong guys who had trained with me for at least three years each. With results like these it’s hard argue. Conjugate periodization is the best system there is for training athletes.
Unless, that is, you have more than 12-16 weeks to train. In this case, the conjugate method may actually be the worst option to choose.
Now before you lose your mind and offer your life savings to anyone who will whack me within the next 48 hours, let me explain.
Even though many athletes end up training for no more than 12-16 weeks per year there are plenty of other athletes who have a significantly longer amount of time to train. A high school or professional football player is an example of this. College football players do not fall into this category since they have to participate in spring ball. Therefore we can not count that as uninterrupted training time. An NFL player, on the other hand, has from January until August to train. With seven months to go before camp, using the conjugate method would be a huge mistake for this athlete. During the beginning of the off season, there is absolutely no need to jump straight into heavy max effort type training. Nor is there a need to do any form of speed work such as plyos, dynamic box squats, throws or anything of the sort. After the previous five months of pounding, the last thing this guy needs to be or feels like doing is depth jumps and heavy deadlifts.
In this situation the best model of periodization to follow is…dare I say it? How will people react to this seemingly blasphemous statement? Oh, what the fuck, here goes…
Classic old school, Western periodization…
There I said it and I’m standing by it.
At the onset of a long off season the main concern should be rest and recovery. Therefore our hypothetical seven month off season should really be more like six or even five and a half months. Immediately after the season, guys should just take off for a month or so. If playing the game of football is like being in dozens of car wrecks each week, I certainly think that a month off is more than needed. Upon returning to training the first thing that should be addressed is any kind of injuries or imbalances that occurred during the season. Since the athlete has just taken four to eight weeks completely off of any training at all we also just need to reestablish a basic base level of fitness. Therefore this first block of training would be a GPP/Rehab type phase. During this time there will be no loading of the spine and no heavy bars in the hands. Almost everything will be done unilaterally and with dumbbells or just bodyweight. Rebuilding lost muscle mass will also be stressed during this phase but if hypertrophy is a very big priority for this particular athlete, the next phase will basically be a hypertrophy only phase. Each of these phases will last about a month.
After completing those two phases the athlete can then begin to move into more of a strength phase. We will assume that he took all of February off and began training in March. So after the first two phases, we will begin the heavy strength work in May. There is just no reason whatsoever to expose this athletes body to the stress of extremely heavy weights any sooner than this. Not only is it detrimental to his joints, spine and CNS but it is also not possible to make significant strength gains for much more than twelve weeks straight.
Think about this for a second; I have athletes adding 100 pounds to their squats in twelve weeks of the summer. Several of my colleagues have achieved the same results in this time frame. Now if the athlete trained for 52 weeks versus 12, how much greater do you think their improvement would be? An extra 20 pounds maybe? What does that tell us? That right there proves that conjugate periodization is not the most effective method for those with extended periods of time to train. Maybe taking significant periods of time away from heavy training is a very good thing. In fact I know it is. How else can the gains that most athletes make during 12-16 weeks of off season training be explained. The abuse the body takes from heavy squatting, benching and deadlifting is immeasurable. There is no way that this can be good for anyone to do year round. The body needs a chance to repair and recover, and that is where old school western periodization comes in.
Ok, with that rant out of the way let’s get back to our hypothetical NFL player and his off season training. After the GPP/Rehab phase and the hypertrophy phase we then move into the maximal strength phase. During this phase we will also introduce some dynamic effort training as well but no extreme training methods like depth jumps will be needed yet. Since you can only make gains from extreme shock training methods like depth jumps for a very limited time and the gains are only truly realized after cessation of the stimulus it is better to save this type of training for the following month, if you even want to use these methods at all. Doing depth jumps for the month of June followed by eliminating them in July will allow the athlete to realize the delayed transformation effect in August when they enter camp.
Depending on the particular athlete and his individual needs there are a few ways we can approach the final few months of off season training. We could focus on maximal strength in May and early June and then switch over to a conversion to power type phase from late June to August in which we focus more on speed training methods with only a maintenance level of maximal strength work. Another option would be to alternate back and forth with three week blocks of each method, i.e. speed and maximal strength. Finally we could opt to go with the conjugate method for the last one to two months. Whatever method is employed, there must be some maintenance hypertrophy work included throughout and calories must remain high. If the athlete really needs to gain size above all else, we would be better off lowering or eliminating most of the speed work and instead focusing only on strength and hypertrophy. As you can see there are many ways to skin a cat and they all result in you having a bloody pile of fur in your hands and a screaming feline trying to rip your eyes out. Wait…wrong cliché. I never understood that one anyway. The point is that if you look beyond conjugate periodization you will find many other options that will help you achieve your goals; many times more efficiently.
The average reader of this site is probably not some one who competes in bodybuilding or powerlifting but rather some one who trains twelve months a year in an effort to get bigger, stronger, leaner and more athletic. If that describes you then a form of Western or alternating periodization is probably a better choice than the conjugate method. As I pointed out earlier it is difficult to significantly increase any one quality for much longer than 12 weeks. So why pound yourself into the ground 52 weeks a year with heavy weights or end up frustrating yourself to the point of insanity when your mass building cycle stops working? Instead, we could all benefit from picking one of these qualities and focusing on it for a given time frame. Just like it is never recommended to attempt to simultaneously lose fat and gain muscle, it is not the best choice to try to improve speed, strength, size and conditioning all at the same time either. Therefore, for the average lifter I would suggest the following periodization plan:
1) GPP/Conditioning/ Unilateral Phase
2) Hypertrophy Phase
3) Maximal Strength Phase
4) Speed/ Power Phase
The length of these phases is really up to you. Phase 1 could be done only once or twice a year if you wanted. Phases 2 and 3 could be alternated for most of the year (this is also known as intensification and accumulation) in one month blocks or for longer periods of up to twelve weeks. From what I have seen with my off season athletes I might tend to lean toward longer phases of each. I think it takes a bit longer than a month to get your strength levels up significantly and I think the longer break from heavy training could do a body a world of good. The conversion to power phase might not be necessary for all athletes and probably isn’t needed for most recreational lifters. However I do recommend that you at least include some speed work in the maximal strength phase.
Now just in case you all thought I forgot the number one argument against Western or linear periodization I will present it right now.
“When you go longer than two to three weeks without training any one particular quality you lose it.”
This is supposedly why it is necessary to always use conjugate periodization and nothing but. This is complete bullshit.
While it may be true that you might regress slightly, let me ask you what happens when you take a layoff from training. I’ll tell you what happens in nearly every single case; you come back and within no time you are stronger than ever. That is why this is the most idiotic argument ever. The people who make this argument will also tell you about muscle memory and how when you come back from training your gains in size and strength will be rapid. Then what the fuck am I missing here? Who cares if you detrain slightly if you will gain it back and then some within two weeks of training that quality again?
Now that we have addressed the issue of periodization there are a few other issues I have with the conjugate method that need to be looked at. When a coach says that he uses a form of conjugate training that usually means he is incorporating some of the Westside techniques. Before I get to that I must point out that I don’t train powerlifters, nor have I ever been a powerlifter myself. I wouldn’t know the difference between a squat suit and a wetsuit. Although I have been in a wetsuit several times, and according to female eyewitnesses, my ass looks pretty good in one. But I digress.
The fact is that I know next to nothing about powerlifting and would never claim to; it’s just not my world. When it comes to powerlifting, Louie Simmons is the master and has produced more champions than just about anyone on the planet. I have learned an infinite amount from Louie and would never challenge anything he had to say about training for powerlifting.
But like I said, this has nothing to do with powerlifting and powerlifters.
While there is much to be learned from the Westside methods you can not blindly take a system designed for powerlifters and use it to train athletes. There are too many differences between the two groups for this to be a good idea. While I have learned an infinite amount from Louie and the Westside methods I still modify much of the information based on the needs of my athletes.
The first mistake many coaches make usually begins with the speed work. Powerlifters usually use a day of dynamic effort benching and a day of dynamic effort box squats with 50-60% of 1RM. With all of the athletes I have ever worked with, those percentages are usually too high. I have worked with hundreds of athletes and have consulted with many colleagues who have done the same and we all came to that same conclusion. As an athlete, if you are going to include speed work in your training, it had better be fast. That is the name of the game, my friends. I have rarely seen anyone that is fast with 60%. Sure there are exceptions to every rule but this is usually the case. Lower the percentages and move faster even if that means 40%. For most athletes, speed work at 60% is about the equivalent of doing cardio at the typical 70% of max heart rate for fat loss. Why waste your time and risk muscle loss when intervals will get the job done much faster and more efficiently? Secondly, this choice of exercises is actually far from the best for many athletes. Light speed work with a bar actually teaches deceleration, the opposite of what an athlete wants to do. You do not want to explosively hit your opponent and then immediately upon contact, decelerate. Quite the contrary, you want to accelerate all the way through and try to blast him across the field. The reason speed work like this teaches deceleration is because the weight will always be too light at the top. While you can add bands and chains to correct this problem, I would have to argue that for athletes, jump squats are superior to box squats and heavy explosive medicine ball throws or plyo pushups are far superior to dynamic bench presses.
Some of the “Westside or die” strength coaches out there denounce the value of Olympic lifting and state that any lift can be done explosively and that box squats are the dominant lower body speed exercise. Yes, if you are a powerlifter, Olympic lifts suck. But one of the most important things to realize when training an athlete such as a football player or wrestler is that it is of the utmost importance that they can not only produce force but ABSORB it. You might be able to dish it out, but can you take it? For this reason the full catch variations of the Olympic lifts are of the utmost benefit to these athletes. Along with drop and catch type exercises such as depth jumps or depth pushups, the Olympic lifts teach the body to absorb force. This effect can not be achieved with a box squat.
As far as producing force goes, the argument by the anti Olympic lifting/ pro box squatting group is the following:
“Let’s assume you can squat 500 pounds and power clean 350 pounds. Well 60% of 500 is 300 pounds and 60% of 350 is only 210 so therefore the box squat is obviously more effective for power development. After all who is going to be able to produce more force, the athlete who trains all off season with 300 pounds or the athlete who trains all off season with 210 pounds?”
Great point. Hard to argue with that.
Except for just one thing there sweetie pie; the power clean and all Olympic lifts are explosive lifts by nature so you would never use 60%. In fact when you use 100% you are moving explosively, you simply have no choice. There is no such thing as a slow power clean. A power clean at 100% is probably more explosive than most box squats at 60%. So in actuality the question should really be this:
Who do you think is going to be able to produce more force, the athlete who trains all off season using 300 pounds or the athlete who trains all off season with 350 pounds?
Iiiiiig-zactly.
Granted the athlete will not always be working at 100% but even if he goes down to 300 pounds it is still just as effective as the box squat at improving force production with the added benefit being that it actually teaches the athlete the all important aspect of absorbing force as well. On top of that, there is no deceleration component to the power clean like there is with the box squat.
So much for that argument.
What about the argument that Olympic lifts are dangerous? Maybe, but so is having a barbell of any weight at all on your spine, and I’m guessing that running full speed into Warren Sapp and having him plant you on the back of your neck is probably not the safest thing in the world either. There are risks in everything an athlete does, deal with it.
The next problem associated with using a powerlifting system to train athletes is the over use of max effort training. Working up to a one or three rep max is a lot more dangerous than doing five singles at 90% or three triples at a slightly lower percentage. This is a risk that athletes simply can not afford to take on a weekly basis. On top of this, working up to a true max is quite taxing to the central nervous system and may actually delay your recovery and thus your rate of progress. Most athletes need to include speed work such as sprints and plyos in their programs along with the heavy lifting. All of these are CNS intensive and too much of any of these stressors can quickly lead to overtraining. Not only this, but true max attempts are stressful on the entire body and most athletes are beat up enough. For this reason it is probably better to limit true all out, max effort attempts to no more than one per month.
On the opposite end of the spectrum from max effort training lays the repetition method. It was once written about how several lifters at Westside Barbell Club did three sets of twenty plus reps on a stability ball dumbbell press one particular workout day. This one story some how led to the new definition of the repetition method in many peoples minds.
Several coaches, including myself, do not find a need for a dynamic upper body day with many athletes. For this reason the dynamic effort bench press has been dropped by many coaches, although I think there is some benefit to some of the catch and release type exercises I detailed earlier. Replacing an upper body speed day with good old fashion repetition work in the range of six to ten reps is a great idea for a lot of athletes. Going higher than this and trying to use the “what they did one day at Westside” definition of repetition work, is not a good idea at all.
It is well known and well documented that conditioning/ endurance work has a negative effect on power. Pull out any of the old Eastern European training books or manuals and you will find this information everywhere. Simultaneously trying to improve endurance and power significantly reduces the effectiveness of your power training. Yet that is what some coaches are advocating by utilizing extremely high reps on a repetition day. For those that don’t know, there is some question as to weather any sets at all above six reps, that’s right SIX reps, will negatively affect an athletes power output. Let me state that again and in a different way so that you can fully appreciate what I am saying. Doing any set above six reps could actually be making you slower and less explosive! The proper hypertrophy range for athletes and the effect that it has on muscle fibers is another article in itself but for now let’s just address the problems associated with super high reps.
The advocates of high rep training state that this method builds muscle. No it doesn’t. Unless I missed the scene in Pumping Iron where Arnold did 30 rep sets on the bench press or missed a chapter in Blood and Guts by Dorian Yates, I can pretty safely say that no one has ever successfully built an ample amount of muscle with high rep training. Beyond your first year as a beginner, high reps are largely useless for building muscle.
High reps are for endurance training, nothing more and nothing less. Endurance training makes your fast twitch fibers take on the characteristics of slow twitch fibers or more simply put, it makes you slow and weak. Not only that, but I think endurance training in the weight room is a waste of time. If you need to bring up your conditioning, do it on the field, the ice, the mat or the court, not in the weight room; that’s where you get big and strong. There is really not much more to say about that as I think that the well known fact that endurance training causes losses in strength, speed and size makes for a pretty good argument against super high rep training.
Although I have successfully used the conjugate method with countless athletes and will continue to do so with many more in the future I hope I have opened your eyes to some other methods available and why nothing is the be all and end all of training. If you have more than 12-16 weeks a year to train, I highly recommend that you give Western periodization a second look or opt for some sort of alternating periodization model. I don’t think you will be disappointed.
A Guest Rant by Joe DeFranco
October 16, 2007
This may come as a surprise to some of you but I have to let the cat out of the bag…
Many of your favorite internet training gurus don’t train anyone. When I say anyone, I don’t mean they train 5-10 people which really equates to no one. I mean they literally train absolutely no one, not a single solitary soul.
Unfortunately for a lot of you, there is no way of actually knowing that. Being in the position I am in, I know who actually trains people (or has trained people) and who doesn’t (or hasn’t). For that reason there are only a few people who I look to for advice or am interested in what they are doing with their athletes or clients. One of the few people that really piques my interest when he writes something about training is my buddy Joe DeFranco. That is because I know for a fact that Joe has spent the last several years in the trenches working with hundreds of athletes. When Joe writes about training he only presents info that is time and battle tested with hundreds of clients, not just some crap he made up to impress people. While we may sometimes disagree on very small points here or there, Joe always has my utmost respect when it comes to delivering training information because he has spent his time in the trenches where it counts.
Below is a rant Joe posted on his site recently that I thought you would like.
**********
For the past 5 years, I’ve been in my own little world – I’ve been totally engrossed in training my athletes and growing my business. I haven’t spent too much time worrying about what goes on in the “fitness industry”. But, for some reason, I spent a little extra time “surfing the web” this past week and I must say that certain things disgusted me! Because of this, I need to get some stuff off my chest! Here we go…
The term “functional training”
I’ve talked about this one before, but it just won’t go away! For some reason, trainers that favor exercises that are performed on stability balls or wobble boards call themselves “functional” trainers. “Functional” trainers also favor light band resistance and med balls instead of heavy barbells and dumbbells. Somehow they have come up with the notion that kneeling on a stability ball while having a pass with a light medicine ball is more “functional” than squatting, dragging a sled, bench-pressing, rowing, strongman training, etc. You don’t need to be a “fitness professional” to realize how illogical this type of thinking is.
“Functional” trainers are the types of trainers that will say a bench press isn’t functional for athletes because athletes never lie on their backs on the athletic field and push a barbell off their chest. But, can someone please explain to me what sport requires an athlete to kneel or stand on a giant beach ball or wobble board? Aren’t most sports played on the fuc#ing ground!? In all of sports, it is the athlete that moves while the playing surface remains still. True “functional” training should consist of applying resistance to an athlete while his/her feet are in contact with the ground. The athlete must then adapt to these forces. This is how true strength is built.
If you’re always performing exercises on “unstable” devices, you will be limited in the amount of weight you can use. This, in turn, will prevent you from overloading the prime movers of the exercise, which will limit how strong you can get.
Bottom line – stability balls and wobble boards are training tools that can be used occasionally in the training of athletes. If they are the centerpiece of your program, my athletes will continue to kick your athlete’s asses!
Internet “trolls”
Internet “trolls” are people who hide behind their computer, make up fake names for themselves and criticize others. Oh yeah, these same people usually have horrible physiques and below average strength – and they’ve never trained an athlete in their life! Yet, they seem to know it all when they’re in the comfort of their home…or should I say the comfort of their parent’s basement! You know the types – these are the people who comment on squat videos because an athlete may have squatted slightly above parallel; or they critique an athlete for performing trap bar deadlifts because “real men do straight bar deads”…blah, blah, blah. The irony of the internet “troll” is that they sit behind their computer and critique people who are actually in the gym training!! Get off the friggin’ computer and go to the gym! You know who you are.
The supplement industry
The supplement industry sucks. There, I said it. The reason I say this is because the best supplements I’ve ever used, you’ve probably never heard of! Wanna know why? Because good supplement companies spend most of their money on RESEARCH – not marketing! The best supplements usually aren’t found on the pages of bodybuilding magazines or on the shelves of popular health food stores. Unfortunately, shelf space is reserved for the companies that are spending big bucks on misleading marketing campaigns. These “mainstream” supplement companies target their advertising towards naïve high school kids. Here’s a good rule of thumb when shopping for supplements – if a product sounds too good to be true… it IS too good to be true. Generally speaking, the more a product is marketed, the more it sucks.
If I sound bitter towards the supplement industry; it’s because I AM bitter!
Authors posing as strength coaches
If someone writes a dozen articles a month on training, they’re not a strength coach – they’re an author. There’s a big difference. If I’m an athlete, I want to be trained by a strength coach that spends most of his day in the gym — not an author that spends most of his day behind the computer. After you’ve trained athletes for at least 12-15 years, you can start writing more than training. Until that time, get your ass in the gym and train so you will have something real to write about!
Coaches that down-play strength
It seems as if many coaches have recently started down-playing the role of strength training for athletes. These coaches will say that “athletes only need a certain level of strength — once optimal strength is achieved, future strength gains may be counter-productive to their sport.” Guess what? I agree with that statement! BUT, how many athletes have walked into your weight room possessing optimal strength? I can tell you in my 10 years of experience, two athletes have joined my program that were “strong enough.”
The moral of the story is the majority of athletes that you’re going to train are weak! Get them stronger and everything else they do will become easier.
Training debates
When I was in school, nerds were on the debate team. Apparently, those nerds are now in the strength & conditioning field. I’m going to let you in on a little secret — Debating never changes anyone’s mind, regardless of the topic! If you put a hardcore Republican and a hardcore Democrat in a room for a debate, do you really think that one of them would be able to convert the other? Of course not!! The same holds true in the strength & conditioning field. For example, if you put an Olympic weightlifting coach in the same room with a powerlifter, neither one of them are going to change each other’s mind! Do you think if Louie Simmons had to attend a H.I.T seminar, he would leave with a new outlook on strength training?! Hopefully you get my point? Save yourself valuable time and energy by surrounding yourself with “like-minded” people and learn/exchange ideas with them.
Ahhhh, I feel better after that little rant. Now that I got that off of my chest, let’s focus on something that doesn’t piss me off…hard-working athletes that bust their ass in order to achieve their goals! No gimmicks, no internet trash-talking – just setting a goal and then doing whatever it takes to accomplish it!
Joe DeFranco.
**********
Don’t forget to sign up for Joe’s mailing list at DeFrancosTraining.com.
A Pathetic Excuse
October 11, 2007
This is an old but very popular post from earlier this year. The email responses to this post were definitely among the highest of the year so I thought I would repost it for anyone who might have missed it. It was written the day after Randy Couture won the UFC world heavyweight title.
*********
Last night, UFC legend Randy Couture came out of retirement and won the world heavyweight title at 43 years old.
And some people’s excuse for why they are not stronger or bigger or leaner or a better athlete is because they are… too old? How sad and pathetic.
Last night was like watching a real life version of Rocky Balboa and the only way not to be motivated by it was if you slept through the fight.
Sylvia was the odds on favorite against the older Couture yet he was completely dominated from start to finish. Randy trained his ass off in preparation for this fight and entered the octagon in the best shape of his life.
Sure, we all don’t have the luxury of being able to do nothing but train, eat and sleep like many pro athletes do but to use that as an excuse is unacceptable. To use age as an excuse is beyond unacceptable.
I can’t tell you how many times I have heard the age excuse used. And every time I hear it, it makes me sick. I once had a client who came to my gym to train at the same time as a particular group of high school kids. The kids were significantly stronger than him on every exercise they did. He used to look on in awe and tell me, “there’s no way I can compete with these high school guys, I’m way too old for that.”
He was 34, and I was completely nauseated by his statement. Being the politically incorrect straight shooter that I am, I immediately snapped at him, “You have got to be kidding me, right? You’re using age as an excuse at 34?! ? You should be ashamed of yourself. They should be saying there is no way they can compete with you because you should be dominating them. ”
I couldn’t look at him for the rest of that workout without wanting to throw up.
I had another client around the same time who displayed the exact opposite attitude and proved what’s possible when you don’t set limits or make excuses. Mark Crook hired me to train him shortly after his 41st birthday. He had barely touched a weight in his life up until that point but was determined to get in shape and give it his all. Once he got a taste of the intense training atmosphere in my gym he was hooked and wanted nothing more than to dominate everyone in his path. He set his sights on some of the young bucks who were significantly stronger than him and vowed to outlift all of them within a year.
With determination, laser sharp focus and ample amounts of hard work Mark went from barely being able to bench press 135 to easily handling 275 in his first year at my gym. In the process he left many of the younger guys who were benching 50-100 pounds more than him when he started, in the dust. Mark went on to become a very good friend of mine and still trains hard to this day. Not once in the entire time that I have known him did I ever hear Mark mention his age and use it as any kind of excuse.
I have another good friend from Arkansas named David Larkan who is one of the most inspiring people you will ever meet. Dave is close to 50 years old and still plays in a wide variety of semi professional sports leagues and trains as hard as anyone I know. I received a phone call from him recently and he told me that despite the numerous injuries he has accumulated over the years he had decided to go back to playing semi pro FOOTBALL for one last season and wanted to know if I could help him get in shape for his last hurah.
In case you missed it, Dave is nearly 50. What’s your excuse again?
Why do some people think that the day you graduate college your ability to do anything physical is automatically rendered useless? It is assumed by a large portion of the population that after college you have to get serious about life and grow up. This usually means giving up sports, sitting in front of a computer all day, getting in terrible shape, taking up golf and basically turning into a complete pussy. Intense physical activity and competition is beneath them apparently.
Get over it and start living.
I recently saw some friends from high school and they confessed that they have not done much physical activity since we graduated fifteen years ago. It showed.
On the other hand, I am a far better athlete today, at 33 then I was back then at age 17 and I am only getting better. Unlike many of my contemporaries, I am relentless and refuse to stop.
But I’m still young so some of the older guys will use that as an excuse. “You’re still in your thirties, wait til you get to be forty, then you’ll see.”
Well then what about Brett Favre, still playing at his age?
Ric Flair is still wrestling a full time schedule and taking bumps off the top rope and steel chair shots in his mid 50’s.
Louie Simmons is still powerlifting with the best of them in his 60’s.
And Randy Couture just competed in the most physically demanding sport on earth last night and won the world heavyweight championship at age 43.
Now tell me one more time, what’s your excuse?
**********
Stop making excuses and start getting results. Click HERE now to get started.
JF
A Great Back Exercise You May Have Never Tried
October 3, 2007

In the gym today we did one of my favorite back exercises. I don’t know what it’s called because I made it up. Before I get 26 emails from people telling me they made it up or they do it let me state that I made it up in “my own mind,” meaning I had never seen it done before and just came up with it one day. Maybe you did the same and I apologize ahead of time for upsetting you. If I write it in a program I usually call it bent over high pulley rope rows.
It’s a combination of a pulldown, a pullover and a row; the best of all three so to speak. To perform the exercise, get in a bent over position, slightly above parallel and grab a rope attached to a high cable stack. Sit way back with your ass all the way out to counterbalance yourself against the pull of the weight stack. While arching your back, let your arms stretch all the way up overhead. If you do it right, you should feel the best stretch in your lats, all the way from your waist to your armpits, that you have felt in a long time. Be sure to let your scapula spread as far apart as possible. Now initiate the movement with your lats by pulling your shoulder blades down. As you pull the rope in toward you in the plane that a pulldown bar would come toward you in, raise your upper body up a few degrees and then row the rope handles into your waist, an inch or two above your belly button. At that point your shoulder blades should be squeezed back all the way. You should get a great contraction and really be able to feel it more than you can a lot of other back exercises. In the contracted position your upper body should be at about a 70 degree angle to the floor.
This is best done for slightly higher reps as a finisher. If you go very heavy on this your form suffers because it is very hard to counterbalance the weight. I suggest 1-2 sets of 8-15 reps after you have done some other rows or chin ups.
Give it a shot and let me know what you think. I’m sure you won’t be disappointed.
Jay
***********
For more mass building exercises click HERE now.



